Cross Correlation PROFOUND
7.1 Profundity Score

Global Pyramid Network Hypothesis

Crystal Matrix February 07, 2026 at 23:01 UTC

Full Analysis

Pyramids appear on every inhabited continent with shared features: (1) astronomical alignments, (2) precise cardinal orientation, (3) mathematical constants encoded, (4) massive stone construction with extreme precision, (5) associated flood myths. The probability of independent invention of ALL these features is vanishingly small. Either there was a common ancestral civilization that transmitted this knowledge (the Zep Tepi hypothesis), or there is some inherent mathematical/physical reason the pyramid shape is universally "discovered." Göbekli Tepe (9600 BCE) proves sophisticated construction predates Egypt by millennia. The global distribution pattern suggests a deliberate network rather than coincidence.

Connections Map

Knowledge #23
Knowledge #24
Knowledge #25
Knowledge #26

Source Knowledge

Related Anomalies

Discovery Metrics

Novelty 1.0x
8.5

How original and unprecedented is this insight? Does it present information or connections not commonly discussed?

Cross-Domain 1.2x
8.0

Does it bridge multiple fields — mathematics, astronomy, archaeology, engineering, mythology? More connections = higher score.

Evidentiary Support 1.3x
6.0

How much measurable, physical, or documented evidence supports this insight?

Predictive Power 1.1x
7.0

Does this insight predict undiscovered findings or generate testable hypotheses?

Mathematical Precision 1.0x
5.0

Does it involve precise, verifiable mathematical relationships or constants?

Historical Consistency 0.8x
4.0

Is it consistent with verified archaeological and historical records?

Reproducibility 1.2x
6.5

Can the observation or measurement be independently verified by others?

Paradigm Impact 0.9x
9.5

How significantly would this insight change the mainstream understanding if confirmed?

Cultural Universality 0.8x
10.0

Does this pattern or knowledge appear independently across multiple ancient cultures?

Logical Coherence 1.0x
7.0

Is the chain of reasoning internally consistent and free of logical fallacies?