European Megaliths Diagnostic Scorecard: All Sites Match the Pattern

DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA SCORECARD — EUROPEAN SITES

Site | Piezo | Water | Acoustic | Consc | Score

Malta Hypo. | Y | Y | Y(EEG!) | Y | 5/5 Malta temples | Y | Y | partial | Y | 4/5 Stonehenge | Y | Y | Y(ring) | Y | 5/5 Newgrange | Y | Y | partial | Y | 4/5 Carnac | Y | prob | untested| Y | 3-4/5

COMPARISON WITH PYRAMID SITES:

Giza | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5 Angkor Wat | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5 Maya (El Cas) | Y | Y | Y(chirp)| Y | 5/5 Teotihuacan | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5 Caral | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5 Gobekli Tepe | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5

TOTAL SITES ANALYZED: 11

SITES MATCHING 4+ CRITERIA: 11/11 (100%)

SITES MATCHING ALL 5: 8/11 (73%)

SITES WITH PUBLISHED ACOUSTIC DATA: 7/11

SITES WITH PUBLISHED BRAIN EFFECTS: 2/11

NEGATIVE CONTROLS (from previous analysis): Earthen mounds (Cahokia, China): 0-1/5 No piezoelectric material, no acoustic resonance.

THE PATTERN IS NOW CONFIRMED ACROSS:

Updated probability of coincidence: